Specialist
Group: Specialist
Posts: 138
Member No.: 20
Joined: 19-May 04
|
The hamster Brain of the week version 4.0 is probably going to come from this FreeRepublic thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1...ts?q=1&&page;=51
Here is but a few of examples of the EvoLOONS, kooks and cranks you will find posting there.
| QUOTE | To: aculeus
the animals perished not millions of years ago but in Noah's Flood circa 2300 BC.
True.
Flooding was a lot easier when the Earth was flat.
4 posted on 06/19/2004 8:18:56 AM PDT by TomDoniphon68 |
| QUOTE | To: aculeus
Well, at least that mystery is solved. IMMENSE AND IMMEASURABLE SARCASM
5 posted on 06/19/2004 8:19:06 AM PDT by RipSawyer (John Kerrey evokes good memories, OF MY FAVORITE MULE!) |
| QUOTE | To: aculeus
Baby Giant Lizards on the Ark...for some reason, that image appeals to me.
Mencken should be alive to appreciate this movement.
;^)
6 posted on 06/19/2004 8:20:59 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!) |
| QUOTE | To: TomDoniphon68
Flooding was a lot easier when the Earth was flat.
?ROFL!!
You would have thought all that water would have washed those bones right over the edge!
12 posted on 06/19/2004 8:26:55 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.) |
| QUOTE | To: randog
Start dabbling in science and you begin asking questions. Pretty soon you realize the truth isn't what your Sunday school teacher's been telling you. So maybe this is a good thing, at least for the younger kids who have time yet to open up their mind.
22 posted on 06/19/2004 8:48:59 AM PDT by Kirkwood |
| QUOTE | To: JohnnyZ
"I wish they wouldn't mix up Christianity with Creationism."
Me too. It gives the former a bad name. The Creationists act like the monkeys evolution implies we came from. In doing so, they only add legitimacy to Darwin's theory.
28 posted on 06/19/2004 9:17:52 AM PDT by elbucko ("Balaam's Donkey" ... Numbers, 22:21-33) |
| QUOTE | To: aculeus
"Heavenly Father, we thank You for the evidence of a catastrophic flood event. We thank You for the time to study Your creation. Heavenly Father, we thank You for the evidence of a catastrophic flood event."
Hari hari hari hari Krishna Krishna Krishna Krishna.
Repeat the chant long enough and your brains will turn to mush.
72 posted on 06/19/2004 6:15:05 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber |
| QUOTE | To: Central Scrutiniser
I still wanna know how the sloth and eht koala managed to crawl all the way across the earth to the ark, then manage to crawl back home after the flood wiped out all the vegetation. All animals for that matter. Never got an answer, just "its a miracle, you heathen!"
The looooooong journey done pooped them out. That's why they move so slowly to this day.
100 posted on 06/19/2004 8:13:37 PM PDT by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com) |
Coral Snake (Jennyp could become the first Hamster Brain to succeed his or her self with this classic
| QUOTE | To: Central Scrutiniser
I like to know how the Ark stayed afloat considering it would have had 2300 species of termites and 210 species of carpenter ants. Each queen of each can produce ~30,000 workers in one year so we are talking about 75,000,000 termites and Carpenter ants.
Plus there would be over 8000 wood-boring Beatles that would have been chewing in the walls of the ark
106 posted on 06/20/2004 12:33:05 AM PDT by qam1 (Tommy Thompson is a Fat-tubby, Fascist) |
Coral Snake (The classic "bug" issue, only in a different form.)
| QUOTE | To: qam1
That's simple, the creationists say that there were no insects because they drew no breath. Which is BS, because insects have a respiration system. Of course the easy answer is that it is a miracle. That is the answer I am going to use to explain evolution to those that refuse to get it. Sure makes life easy!
110 posted on 06/20/2004 9:10:26 AM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am) |
| QUOTE | To: Ichneumon; jennyp; Don Joe
The witness had originally said, back in post 83:
I'd be interested in hearing about how natural selection could gradually produce that "machinery".
The very clear implication was that he believed it impossible for such a creature (the bombardier beetle) to have evolved naturally. Then he was informed of how it could have happened (by my post 92). His response (post 95) was not to find factual or logical fault with the proposed natural evolutionary path, but to wave it away:
What I find even more amazing than the contents of that page is the fact that there are people with faith sufficient to accept that ungainly stretch as truth.
This is classic creationist behavior. First he implied (in effect) that natural evolution of the bombardier beetle was impossible. When that claim was demolished by showing one way it could have happened, he responds by claiming that it's still impossible. So whatcha gonna do? Game over.
115 posted on 06/20/2004 10:29:12 AM PDT by PatrickHenry |
Coral Snake (What is with these EvoLOONS and BUGS????!!!!!!)
| QUOTE | To: VadeRetro
When a creationist says he'd be interested in seeing evidence against his statements ... he wouldn't.
All right. From now on (if I can remember this moment), when a creo asks for evidence, I won't automatically provide a helpful link. First I'll inquire if he is actually claiming that there is no evidence. I'll ask if he really wants to see evidence, even if it means that his claim will be shown to be wrong. Will the evidence make any difference to him, or will his beliefs continue, as if the evidence had never been presented? Then, if I get satisfactory responses, I'll link to the evidence. (But I suspect that if I adhere to this procedure, I won't be posting very many links.)
128 posted on 06/20/2004 7:05:41 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Don't ask for evidence if you're going to ignore it when you see it.) |
Coral Snake (Probably because there is no evedence to link to IDIOT!!!!)
| QUOTE | To: VadeRetro
That's okay. If he thinks I'm bluffing, then he won't be shy about making a commitment. Not that I'd expect compliance; that would be honorable behavior. Rather, we'd see the customary tap-dancing, twisting, goal-post moving, etc. So maybe you're right. Or maybe I'm in a bad mood this evening.
131 posted on 06/20/2004 7:11:47 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Don't ask for evidence if you're going to ignore it when you see it.) |
Coral Snake (Same chucklehead, same lack of evedence.)
| QUOTE | To: VadeRetro
That's okay. If he thinks I'm bluffing, then he won't be shy about making a commitment. Not that I'd expect compliance; that would be honorable behavior. Rather, we'd see the customary tap-dancing, twisting, goal-post moving, etc. So maybe you're right. Or maybe I'm in a bad mood this evening.
131 posted on 06/20/2004 7:11:47 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Don't ask for evidence if you're going to ignore it when you see it.) |
|
Christian Dinosaur Dig Thread at FreeRepublic, produces rich ore of Evo Hamster Brains
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
Posted: Jun 24 2004, 03:02 AM
