DesignedUniverse -> Another EvoLOONACY posted by jennyp

Another EvoLOONACY posted by jennyp, (aka EmmaPeel on Creation/Evolution)

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

Coral Snake	Posted: May 25 2004, 07:49 PM
Specialist Group: Specialist Posts: 138 Member No.: 20 Joined: 19-May 04	This one is SOOO BAAADDD that even the other evos there don't seem to be ready to swollow it as yet. Woutd you believe that they are now saying that the newst found relaative of man is a WORM????!!!!!!! http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com/?vThreadID=885

Charity	Posted: May 25 2004, 11:11 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 314 Member No.: 4 Joined: 14-February 04	Well after all they do believe we came from a ROCK!!!BWAAAHAAAAA :lol:

Andrewc

Posted: May 26 2004, 12:12 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 16
Member No.: 8
Joined: 15-February 04

QUOTE (Coral Snake @ May 25 2004, 07:49 PM)

This one is SOOO BAAADDD that even the other evos there don't seem to be ready to swollow it as yet. Woutd you believe that they are now saying that the newst found relaative of man is a WORM????!!!!!!!

http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com/?vThreadID=885

Your link sent me on a information quest. Brother, did I find data that demonstrate the utter fantasy that these "scientists" believe. Just a tidbit.

http://www.mdgekko.com/devonian/Order/new-order.html

QUOTE

In fact, the fossil skull of one species, Elpistostege, was originally classified as a tetrapod. But they differ from early tetrapods in several crucial ways, including the possession of fins rather than feet.

http://www.mdgekko.com/devonian/Order/re-elipistostege.html
(IMG:http://www.mdgekko.com/devonian/Order/images/s-elpistostege.gif)

QUOTE

Elpistostege watsoni
When Stanley Westoll reported on the first Elpistostege fossil (a partial skull roof) in 1938, he identified it as an early amphibian. With the discovery of additional fossils (partial skulls plus associated vertebrae and scales) in the 1980s, however, it was found to be a close relative to Panderichthys, a lobe-fin fish from Latvia. Elpistostege differs from Panderichthys mainly in its longer snout, smaller and more rounded orbits and slightly different pattern and proportion of dermal bones in the skull. The redescription of Elpistostege based on these newer specimens led Hans-Peter Schultze and Marius Arsenault to conclude that Panderichthys and Elpistostege exhibited a variety of features intermediate between those of the tristichopterid lobe-fins (e.g., Eusthenopteron) and the early tetrapods. A more recent paper by Per Ahlberg concludes that Elpistostege is more closely allied with the stem tetrapods than is Panderichthys.

So based on a piece of a skull roof they identified a legged creature, but were forced to recalculate based on finding partial skulls, scales, and vertebrae. They had to make it a fish. What loony "science". But to top it off here is how they sometimes group their findings.

http://www.mdgekko.com/devonian/who/pages/hynerpeton.html

QUOTE

A tetrapod jawbone located about 50 m from the shoulder fossil was originally suspected to have also belonged to Hynerpeton. However, another jawbone located only 30 cm from the shoulder was discovered sometime later. This second jawbone is now regarded as belonging to Hynerpeton, whereas the other specimen belongs to a separate species, Densignathus rowei.

50m!! They were willing to associate things found 1/2 a football field away from each other to support their theories. Incredible!

Charity	Posted: May 26 2004, 02:33 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 314 Member No.: 4 Joined: 14-February 04	Utter fantasy. :lol:

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | EvoLOONacy | Next Newest »